Boeing x32a where is it

Search only containers. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. Install the app. Contact us.

Close Menu. Forums Other Eras Modern. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. Thread starter johnbr Start date Jul 31, Robert Sullivan. The Fa mock-up net. Last edited: Jul 31, The cockpit. The X lost due to multiple shortcomings, the biggest being an inferior lift system to the X which would lead to hot exhaust being reingested by the intake , failure to iron out issues with making the upper surface of the wings out of a single piece of carbon composite which would have provided significant weight savings , issues with reaching the top speed of the aircraft and making vertical flight in the same test flight this meant that Boeing had two different aircraft in testing, the XA and XB , and a sudden Navy decision to modify low speed manuevring requirements, necessitating a change in planform for the X Aircraft Super Thread Mk.

The final X used a trapezoidal wing with conventional horizontal stabilators. Apparently at the time, Dassault engineers known for their Rafale and Mirage delta wing fighters said Boeing was doing it wrong.

SaparotRob Chief Master Sergeant. It looks weird enough to be British. Nice photos but what a loser of an aircraft! Last edited: Aug 6, GreenKnight Airman 1st Class. A major part of the loss was that, in lieu of set performance parameters, the DOD had required "that the prototypes actually deliver the performance that the contractor's detailed estimates promise".

In other words, the winner would be whomever's aircraft performed most closely to what they designed it to do. To develop everything from avionics to hardware to software. Boeing decided to try to make the X on price. These production lines were state of the art and had a higher level of automation. Whilst this cost a small number of jobs, it also reduced costs for Boeing. In turn, the aircraft produced on these production lines can be offered at a much lower price.

One of the main parts of the JSF program was that the aircraft had to have a low aspect ratio, in order to be a stealth aircraft.

To do this, Boeing designed the X to have very jagged edges, in order to deflect radar waves. In order to keep this, and to make the X supersonic, Boeing designed the X with a delta wing. Whilst this gave the X-3 a lower aspect ratio and faster speeds, it reduced maneuverability. To do this, Boeing used direct-lift thrust vectoring.

This used an engine with two exhaust ports, rather than just one. One of these was at the back for normal flight, whilst the other was at the center of gravity for STOVL. Despite all of this, the JSF specifications were not iron-clad. This was shown in , when the US Navy altered its specifications for payload and maneuverability. This resulted in the Boeing X not fitting the specifications. The main issue was not that the specifications were unreasonable or that the X needed a significant redesign.

Instead, it was down to the fact that Boeing was already construction two X demonstrators. As such, Boeing engineers were forced to make extremely quick modifications to the X in order to fit these new, revised specifications. This gave the X added maneuverability and reduced weight in order to increase the payload. Eight months later, in December , Boeing revealed two Boeing X demonstrators.

One was an XA, where the other was an XB. This was a surprise, as many believed that Boeing would only build one. In October , Lockheed had unveiled their completed prototype, designated as the X By , test flights had begun on both the Lockheed Martin X and Boeing X, with both military and civil test pilots.

Many of the first XA test flights were conducted by Boeing-employed test pilots, whilst the later ones were by military test pilots. Whilst the aircraft flew its mission successfully, it was later found that a minor hydraulic leak had occurred, causing the pilot some mild issues.

Many of the first flights were the same flights done by the XA, months previously. Many of these missions saw the X taking off from short runways, flying long missions, before vertically landing. The last test flights concluded in July Here, the US military collected data from the tests of both the Boeing X and the Lockheed Martin X, as well as interviewing the military-employed X and X test pilots.

When announcing this, the reasoning was that the X consistently outperformed the X on the battlefield. And in particular, the speed difference, where the X exceeded on, was negligible. The Lockheed Martin X was modified slightly and entered production as the F Immediately following this, many Washington State senators and congressmen began lobbying to make Boeing a subcontractor for the F Despite never going beyond the test flight phase, Boeing, as with Lockheed Martin had designed three variants of the X As you can probably imagine, much of the material about the X is still highly classified.

Many of the test pilots who flew the X on behalf of Boeing and the US military, signed contracts that forbade them talking to the press. And even then, this interview was quite brief and was particularly vague. Immediately following this statement, Major Karnes stated that the X could be fueled up and would probably beat the contingent of Fs that had accompanied him to Patuxent River Naval Air Station.

For many avgeeks, they have still criticized the Boeing X Other avgeeks have continually said that the X should be slightly altered and enter service in a ground attack role to compliment the F Each time they have failed a contract, they have learned something different.